El Tercer Brazo

 
Filed under

exhibition website

 

Skinny Jeans

Produced by the Wexner Center for the Arts in Columbus Ohio, the website “Pinocchio Is On Fire” accompanies an exhibition of Mark Bradford’s work on view there until 10 October 2010 (and followed by an impressive tour). It is an interesting exhibition website, I think, because it makes me wonder if it is an exhibition website at all. It points less to the exhibition than to its subject: the artist and his work.

Etb-18_bradford-home1

The site content is visually organized in two categories, “the studio” and “the art”. The studio section contains four pages that illustrate different concepts relevant to Bradford’s studio practice by looking at specific projects or works in depth. The content is a richly produced, video-heavy mix of windows on Bradford’s process, interests and history, and each page has a very distinct look and feel. The overall tone is dark and layered – a black background and heavy tone speaking to the personal, the interior. The designers and producers make full use of the medium here, and the page about “duality” offers an interactive split-screen shot of the artist speaking over himself – until you drag the dividing bar to the left or right in order to listen to one Bradford versus the other. The section also offers selections from Super-8 films shot back in 1975, revealing the young artist as filmmaker, seen in a private screening room and accompanied by a touching voice-over comparing the artistic process to the arc of human relationships.

Etb-18_bradford-duality1
Etb-18_bradford-relationship1

In contrast, the art section is sparse and clear. The border changes from black to white, and the individual paintings are “hung” on a white wall. The occasional prop – power sander, broom, ladder ­– gives a sense of scale but also adds to the feeling of a digitally staged environment. This is not a record of an exhibition; it is a web presentation, an illustration. This does have its advantages (despite the repeating pattern of cracked wall behind the images – a “museum wall wallpaper” made for the occasion): you can jump back and forth between images, and the zoom is so absolute that you can go close enough to see pinholes in a work that is as large as 130 x 196 inches. This ability to see and “read” the surface is crucial in Bradford’s heavily-layered, collaged work. The section comprises eight paintings and one multimedia installation – the “Pinocchio Is On Fire” that gives the website its name. Each work is accompanied by extensive label information, and most have an audio/video clip of the artist speaking about a particularly interesting aspect of the work.


Along the footer are the hard facts: biographical information about the artist, more on his process, exhibition details, and credits. Sadly, the background music stops when you click on these menu items; perhaps it is time to concentrate. But even here, text is accompanied by audio and video tracks that continue Bradford’s autobiographical narrative and tie the whole experience together.

From an institutional perspective, the problem lies just there. The site is about artist Bradford, and is a very successful branding exercise as such. However, this comes at the expense of the exhibition itself. The site reveals no sense for curatorial voice - how the work is selected, installed, interpreted, or what its larger context is. The exhibition checklist, which is a separate PDF download, reveals that there are 52 works in the exhibition (of which only nine can be seen on the website). Bradford’s voice and character are the story of the site. Produced by Resource Interactive, the site takes full advantage of his fascinating character, both visually and acoustically. This is very well done, with a marketing mind for excellent photography, video, typesetting and interactive behaviors to support the artwork. Bradford’s own background music adds wonderful rhythm to the site, which fades back comfortably whenever an audio or video feature is played. Be sure to also download the track and listen to it alone to really get into it.

 

Filed under  //   Mark Bradford   Resource Interactive   Wexner Center for the Arts   exhibition website  

Comments [0]

Sunday Reading

What makes a good exhibition website? On MoMA’s blog Inside/Out Senior Media Developer, Digital Media Shannon Darrough interviews web designer Yugo Nakamura, who designed the site for MoMA’s 2008 Design and the Elastic Mind exhibition. The interview is brief and Nakamura’s spare comments don’t reveal too much about his working process, but he does make an important point about a core challenge in designing exhibition websites:

“We first thought about the two functions the website needed to cover. One was that the website itself became a form of creative expression that follows the theme of the Design and the Elastic Mind exhibition. The other was to make sure that it also functioned as an informational website.”

Etb-9_moma-datem-1

What I love about that website is how it captures the curatorial spirit of the exhibition without relying on the show’s physical presentation. This allows the site to exist online in its own time, with tremendous relevance long after the exhibition is deinstalled. The site packs in a huge amount of content (more entries than the exhibition itself), and makes a complex network of relationships beautifully visible. The hard facts about the exhibition are found only in the exhibition archive on the main MoMA site.

Etb-9_moma-datem-2

Yesterday was the deadline for submissions to the Museums and the Web 2010 Best of the Web competition. (See the list of entries here.) I will take a closer look at the nominees in the coming days. In the exhibition category, we'll have to see which sites manage to become a form of creative expression following the theme of the exhibition while still functioning as an informational tool. Among the submissions is MoMA’s more recent website for Gabriel Orozco, designed by Shannon Darrough inhouse. I’m a little torn about that one. It is amazing to have images of the entire show online, including notebook pages - a full deck of “playing cards”. But there is something limiting about treating each work as an equal image; online I get a sense of homogeneity that is not at all the case in Orozco’s actual work. I like that the primary navigation is intuitive browsing by associated works, but I wish that the relationships connecting these works was more apparent - as they are on Design and the Elastic Mind

Etb-9_moma-orozco

Filed under  //   MW   MoMA   exhibition website  

Comments [2]

When in LA

How to give an exhibition relevance online is one of the problems I find most interesting for museums now. It is a question of making the exhibition alive outside of the museum building. There are some excellent ideas and projects out there, but on the whole this area is fertile ground for improvement and innovation.

The MAK Center in Los Angeles gives us a successful example of a simple, (presumably) low-budget website that will draw visitors to its outdoor exhibition How Many Billboards?. On view at the MAK Center’s Schindler House is only an overview, while the commissioned artworks are dispersed on billboards throughout the city. The 21 billboards are installed over a period of time, making it an exhibition that unfolds both in time and space. In this context, the website is more than an exhibition accompaniment; it is integral to the discovery of the works. The homepage is a Googlemap marking the billboard locations, updated live as the billboards are mounted. Consider it a tool for changing your usual commute.

There is an RSS feed, but better still is to follow the exhibition updates on Twitter and see the latest installation photos on Twitpic.

 
Etb-8_mak-map

Filed under  //   MAK   Twitter   exhibition website   geotagging   public art  

Comments [0]